| 
   Program notes, Grace Cathedral, San Francisco December
        1998:   This is a project in which 28
        homeless people had their pictures taken where they lived or liked to
        hang out and again after they had been made over to look like fashion
        models. There was no satire intended. Rather, the idea was to show these
        people at their peak. Further, I felt it would be so much easier for the
        rest of us to care about people, and harder to forget them, once we knew
        their names. I still believe that, but I have now also to consider
        the view from the other side. Lawrence Green, the first model who called
        me after his case worker told him about the project, was upset by the
        idea that his name might be linked to homelessness indefinitely. “What
        happens after I get a job?” he wanted to know. “I’ll write
        ‘Happily Employed’,” I promised. But that was a flip answer. These
        peoples’ lives are fluid, while the pictures capture and keep a 60th
        of a second or less. Still, these pictures compare and contrast the
        documented life to the invented one – the one that might be. Some people whom I asked to contribute money or goods
        to this project worried about what would happen after the models had
        been made over and then had to go back to their real lives. These models
        are complex adults as rich as reality. Just because they are in need
        doesn’t make them simple. They shoulder extraordinary responsibilities
        in order to protect their children from dangerous people or, like Mr.
        Toshi who travels an hour and a half by bus each way to get his son to
        school each day. Does that mean he can no longer imagine? Take a
        holiday? Separate work from play? Do we insist that the homeless must be
        genuinely helpless before we can assist them? There are as many different kinds of homeless
        individuals as there are housed. I hope this exhibit reminds us that the
        homeless are not only the people we feel threatened by because they are
        sleeping in a doorway we wish to enter. Or because they are begging for
        money. Or that all homeless people become so out of stupidity or
        shiftlessness. Twenty-five of the 28 people in
        this exhibit showed up on time and worked well and hard. I defy you to find the one who showed up six hours
        late and drunk. She’s the one who holds herself like a professional
        model. But she hadn’t washed her hair in three months and she arrived
        at Architects and Heroes too late for a cut. She got ugly with the
        make-up artist who had given her time and materials for free and might
        have expected some appreciation. But the homeless are people just like
        paying customers, they have sweet personalities and cruel ones. It’s
        our vanity that wants people to be grateful for charity. It was shocking, sometimes, to discover how easily
        some people had reached their predicament. Richard Stephens was once one
        of the guards who protected President Kennedy. Recently he had been
        living a happy, productive life in Portland, Oregon, until he got hit by
        a car one day and had to be hack-sawed out of his driver’s seat. It
        took him years of hospitalization and therapy to become one of the
        amazing recovery stories. But he had nowhere to go after he got out of
        the hospital. He lives with a friend now and needs to work again. He’s
        got aspirations to teach golf for a living. For fun, on Sunday mornings,
        he teaches kids to play. I think he’d be good with kids. His case worker, Danielle Lacampagne, at the
        Veterans’ Administration Compensated Work Therapy Program, talks a lot
        about the miracle she finds in each of her ‘survivors.’ These
        miracles are made out of facing hard facts and surmounting them day by
        day. The social workers I met were unending in the trenches helping to
        make difficult decisions. Their organizations didn’t want to be
        thanked in this exhibit. Many helped generously, but should the models
        be unhappy with the experience the advocacy organizations want that to
        be my fault, not theirs. I often had to say that before taking the first
        pictures of someone who had come to me because their case worker had
        told them about the project. I had originally intended to select the models after
        having met them and decided that I could make them over. It didn’t
        work that way in practice. There wasn’t time. There wasn’t a way to
        meet people. Instead, case workers at various advocacy organizations
        asked individuals if they’d like to participate, and if so, they
        called me up. With a few exceptions, I included whoever called me. I
        simply made an appointment on the spot and went to take their picture.
        It was impossible to get in touch with many of the models by phone. No
        none had their own transportation, with the exception of one couple who
        lived in their van. We should remember how much harder it is for a
        homeless person to participate in society than it is for us. We should
        give them double the credit when they do participate. For me, the heart-rending person is Suny H. Roberts.
        She’s the only model I met on the street. This was in July, when I
        needed a picture to put on the proposal for this project. She’s the
        only one who sleeps on the streets and eats at soup kitchens while she
        waits for her boyfriend to get out of San Quentin, again. Suny has the
        most beautiful face, life shines out of her. I met her once at the
        Martin de Porres soup kitchen where she was having lunch. I guess
        she’d forgotten I was coming because she wasn’t inside the door as
        promised. Instead, she was sitting at a picnic table hovering over her
        food with a hood over her head, but still I spotted her in the crowd
        without trouble. Her small slice of cheek looked like velvet in a row of
        lettuce. It was that day she took a picture from her pocket
        revealing a very unattractive, very overweight Sheryl Roberts. That was
        Suny before the degenerative bone marrow disease that keeps her in
        constant pain yet somehow ravishing. Suny wants to leave San Francisco.
        She wants to go somewhere easier. I want to scoop Suny up and give her a
        place to rest her bones and keep from getting a chill. But I can’t do
        that by myself. I’m just a photographer who can introduce her to you.
        This exhibit is one effort in a very large social structure. I don’t want to undervalue this exhibit. I’m proud
        of the community effort this represents. Grace Cathedral has been
        astonishing in their caring and skill. I think the pictures challenge
        our assumptions about appearance. Many of these people have a big gap in
        their resumes, but so do mothers who take off work when they have
        children. This project has been called controversial. I should hope so.
        Grace Cathedral says they are hosting the exhibit in the spirit of open
        discussion of important issues. I felt the same when I set out to make
        this project. Having met the models, I have more hopes for their future
        employment than I did beforehand, but for the rest of us and for
        potential employers, I hope these pictures stir you up. For good or ill,
        at last the homeless are then in the forefront of your thoughts. And
        maybe you’ve got a better way to help.   
   
        
        Naming the
        Homeless: Portfolio
        
  
   
   Program Notes, City Hall, San Francisco August –
        September 1999:   Most people who see these photographs think the people
        in them are lovely. Sometimes the complaint is that the people don’t
        change enough from street to make-over picture – to begin with, they
        look too good. Another point that has been voiced is that not all
        homeless people believe in make-up and pretty clothes. O.
        K. These 28 models are not all homeless
        people. They are among the homeless who want to be appreciated for their
        skills and what they have to offer the community. They want to be a part
        of it. The obstacles to making this happen are vast. These people are
        getting training but they need transportation, too. They need the
        confidence to be persistent and consistent. They need to be hired.
        Don’t we all? If there is one ultimate goal in this exhibition it is
        to remind us that these people are our neighbors. We need to remember
        their names. We need to know them. It took a huge effort from a lot of people to make Naming
        the Homeless and while we were doing it we all said, if just one
        person is helped seriously this will be worth it. What we didn’t
        foresee was the effect the experience was having on us. The production
        manager, Corey Nettles, left photography so she could go back to school
        to become a teacher. After Naming her work seemed unfulfilling.
        The project opened up the world of political journalism to me. I am now
        working on a project about death row. About a month ago I sent out letters to all the
        participant models asking how they were doing and whether they’d like
        to say so on camera for Scott Stender, the man making a documentary
        about Naming the Homeless. The first call was from Tamieka
        Alford, who said that she had a satisfying job working with homeless
        prenatal parents and children. She is getting paid $6.50
        an hour. Her son (who was 12 years old when I took
        Tamieka’s first picture) is doing well. Patricia Davis was the next to
        call. She, too, loves her work as a counselor for people who are
        drug-dependent. She makes $8.00 an hour. She told
        me I could tell Tamieka to call her because her clinic was hiring. I
        believe Tamieka will stay on the track she started, but the notion of
        her and Patricia networking had never occurred to me. Neither had I seen
        how they both could have taken their worst experiences and turned them
        into the basis for employment. I am deeply admiring of the way they are
        working to support their children. There is a lot to be learned from
        these women. I know the many people who gave money and time and
        clothes and food to make this project will be gratified to hear about
        any of the homeless models as they strive and develop. I for one am
        looking forward to the day Catherine Latta finishes her schooling and
        becomes a nurse. I want to know if Rosemary McCord got into the
        janitors’ union. I can’t find Larry Edmond. Is that because he
        finally went home to his family after 13 years
        away? I’m wondering if Richard Stephens applied to teach at the new
        public golf course at the Presidio. Everyone I know who was involved
        with this project is excited and curious when they spot one of the
        participants on the street. I only hope the models can appreciate how
        much they have expanded and enriched our lives. Thank you. Keep in
        touch. 
   
 The best way to look at the success of the project is
        by looking at what has happened to some of the participants in the year
        since the pictures were taken.-L.G.  Kirstin Bain – She was living in Guerrero House. She is now supporting
        herself in an apartment and recently left a job as a manager at Tower
        Records to join the employee-owned cooperative at Rainbow Grocery.
    Rosemary McCord – She was living in low-income housing and raising her
        son, Fabien. She has a five-year lease she hopes she can renew. But the
        city no longer pays her rent. She is now a janitor in a union, working
        toward seniority and a permanent job in an office building.
   Catherine Latta – She was in Raphael House. She has since started
        the two-year program at Clara House and City College, where she is
        training to become a Licensed Vocational Nurse. She is a year through
        the program and very much looking forward to supporting herself and her
        son in their own apartment while she studies another two years to become
        a Registered Nurse.  Richard
        Stephens – He was moving from relative to relative as he tried
        recuperating from a near-fatal car crash which ended his career as a sky
        cab with his own shoe-shine business. His physical therapy was
        preoccupying. Now he has reconciled with his wife and they live in Cole
        Valley. As a boy Richard was a golfer who competed on the circuit in the
        mid-west. He now volunteers as a golf instructor to children in San
        Francisco and acts as a marshal on a course in Burlingame.
 Patricia Davis – She was a heavy drug user, with two children she
        couldn’t look after. She is now a clean, responsible single mother who
        loves her job as a counselor to drug-dependent individuals. Tameika Alford – She is a third-generation welfare child. But after
        having her own baby, she found work as a councilor with prenatal
        homeless women. She is living in the Cecil Williams Glide Community
        House and looking forward to becoming a social worker. Lenora Hughes – She was a drug-dependent young woman living from
        night to night in shelters that kicked her out during the day. Soon
        after I took her picture, she called to try and frighten me into giving
        her money. She has recently called again to tell me she’s been through
        treatment for her drug addiction and she’s doing well.   See also: Naming the
        Homeless: Portfolio “On Lucy Gray’s Photography” Contributors   next page    |